|
Angles | | | Refer This Article |
|
Being positive
is an old Jewish practice. Who knew? |
![]() |
The story changed between the idea and when I sat down to write about the idea. It will have changed again by the time you read this. The story is always changing. In the morning the story is about a young celebrity, her insobriety, her bizarre behavior, her weight, her fitness for motherhood. By noon it is the pregnancy of her even younger sister.
|
|
unchanged is our
desire to draw conclusions. But why do we feel we must we sum up the
story? Why must we be judge and our peers jury? There is another option, although most of us aren’t built for it, not culturally, at least: The benefit of the doubt.
“Without training you won’t do it,” says Morinis, author of “Everyday Holiness: The Jewish Spiritual Path to Mussar.” “It’s something that has to be cultivated.”
The benefit of the doubt has an ancient Jewish pedigree. In Hebrew, the concept is called dan l’kaf z’chut, and with it you can draw a line with one end in the book of Leviticus and the other in the latest morsel about Britney Spears.
It’s a wild ride, full of wisdom and
contradiction. And here is where it begins, in Leviticus chapter 19,
verse 15: “…in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.” That’s it. A fragment of a verse, which the rabbis in Pirkei Avot (The Chapters of the Fathers) broke open. Inside, they discovered how that abstract notion can be understood to apply to the real life of real people: |
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, “it’s innocent until proven guilty,” says Rabbi Stephen Weiss, of B’nai Jeshurun Congregation, in Pepper Pike, Ohio, outside Cleveland. “If you see someone doing something, and you can ascribe either a bad motive to that person’s actions or a good motive, then ascribe a good motive. There’s a heavy weight in our tradition against making snap judgments.”
It’s tough to keep from snapping when the story keeps changing, the news keeps cycling and the information is overloading. Our minds demand some conclusion, a judgment that ties a story together and files it away neatly. It’s tough to just let it lie. To see Britney and just walk away.
I’m new to the idea as well – I first heard the term during a conversation with a smart, learned friend. As I did my research to try to find out more, I came across the following entry by an Orthodox blogger:
“Britney Spears is a bit eccentric… She made the news again the other day with her new haircut – a completely shaved head…
“My wife suggested that maybe she donated her hair to a cancer organization or something like that. We were fairly impressed that we could be 'melamed zechut' (find a meritorious way of explaining the situation), even though [Spears] has a reputation of being a bit hasty and freaky.”
Later, I mentioned the blog entry to Rabbi
Weiss. He thought about the blogger’s attempt to judge from the
positive side of the scale and then went a step further. “Why should
we care if she cuts off her hair?” he said. “Why do we have to
judge?”
'Musar is how you interact with other
people.' They don’t pass laws against things people aren’t doing. So if the Torah says to judge your neighbor in righteousness, my hunch is that means an awful lot of our biblical ancestors were doing the opposite.
And the midah, which the rabbis developed later, reminds us that we should not judge solely on appearances – a lesson drilled into us from childhood. “It’s not something that can be wished for,” Morinis says. “Without training you won’t do it. If it came to us naturally, we wouldn’t have to cultivate it.” |
|
That could be changing.
Rabbi Debra Newman
Kamin, of Am Yisrael in the Chicago suburb of Northfield,
Illinois, wonders if the popularity of Jewish practices swings like
a pendulum. If so, |
|